Anti-gun hysteria with a serious purpose
If someone is killed by a person with a shovel, should the shovel manufacturer be held liable?
As silly as that may sound, this is precisely the argument being expounded in cities like Chicago, Los Angeles, Miami, Boston and New Orleans, where suits have been filed against gun manufacturers seeking damages for the misuse of their products.
A blatant anti-gun agenda is being pressed onto a largely unaware American public. It continues unabated even after our elected representatives in Congress last year failed to pass further restrictive anti-gun legislation and recent studies which show that communities allowing citizens to carry handguns experience a sharp drop in violent crime.
You would think that in a nation which prides itself on being a participatory democracy, that the folks who want to disarm America would take no for an answer and yield for a while.
But this is not the way it works in the real world. A carefully planned strategy to abolish guns continues to be pushed by the inner circle of the New World Order bunch. They fund a variety of individuals and organizations which further their goals.
Back in 1994, when some states began suing tobacco companies, the public was assured that this spectacle of the government suing private companies for real or imagined problems was only going to be limited to tobacco, which after all is a demonstrable health hazard.
Well, now this same questionable practice is being used against gun manufacturers.
It is a program which has been nurtured since the early 1990s by individuals within Hangun Control, Inc. (HCI), that Sarah Brady group whose avowed purpose is “the total elimination of arms” in America.
In a December, 1993, leaked document entitled “Confidential Information for use by Lobbyists or Senior Officials Only!” the HCI leadership even laid out their plan for the national licensing of handguns. They proposed yearly licensing fee beginning at a cost between $50 and $75, with ever increasing payments over an eight-year period. “If private ownership has not been prohibited by this time then fees can be gradually increased to discourage private ownership,” stated the HCI author, who added that “brainstorming meetings will be held at the White House through Winter, 1994” for the purpose of guiding “the focus of gun control initiatives over the next five years.”
Some of these “initiatives” proposed bans on a variety of weapons and ammo clips, even banning “realistic replicas/toy guns,” as well as “all semi-automatics (regardless of when made or what caliber)” and prohibiting all gun shows, “military reenactments,” “the assembly of more than 4 armed individuals who are not peace officers or military,” “hunting on all public lands” and support for “Random Police checks for weapons”. One specifically called for the “right” to bring lawsuits against gun manufacturers and dealers “perhaps with money from government programs”.
But this part of the plan ran afoul of timid government officials who realized what a stink would be raised if the American public learned that tax money was being used to close down American businesses as well as subvert the 2nd Amendment.
So, an end run play has been called. Lawsuits now being filed against gun companies are being funded by wealthy members of the secret societies who seek one world government, according to The Washington Post.
George Soros, a member of the secretive Council on Foreign Relations and the even more secretive Bilderbergers as well as a consultant to presidential aspirant Al Gore, has provided the funds to hire lawyers to attack the gun companies through his New York-based Open Society Institute. Soros, a Hungarian by birth, controls foundations in 30 nations. He also has come under scrutiny for suspected involvement with the Russian mafia.
The Center on Crime, created by Soros’ Open Society Institute and aggressively anti-handgun, put up $300,000 to finance a successful Brooklyn lawsuit against gun manufacturers.
Gun control has longed been a staple agenda of the globalists, who are only too conscious of the problem of trying to coerce an armed population. Anti-gun efforts in Australia and England have been largely successful with an attendant, but little reported, increase in violent crime. No wonder a spokesman for the National Rifle Association (NRA) charged that Soros and his foundations were part of a “vast conspiracy” to bankrupt gun makers.
Speaking of the NRA and to older readers, isn’t it interesting how actor Charleton Heston for many years was revered by the establishment media for his biblical roles and conservative politics, but once he was elected president of the NRA, his image recently has become a sort gun-happy cowboy on the fringe of society?
If you would like to know more about the New World Order and its impact on America’s national sovereignty, be sure and send for a copy of Jim Marrs’ new underground best seller “Rule by Secrecy”.
|