Amtrak Will Screen Passengers’ Bags
SARAH KARUSH – 2008-02-20
BIG BROTHER ARRIVES ON AMTRAK DEPT.
Although Amtrak Chief Executive Alex Kummant states “There is no new or different specific threat,” the quasi-governmental train service will now emulate airport security. All this despite the fact that no significant terrorist event has taken place since 9/11 in the United States. With the Real-ID Act soon to require only federally-approved identification for travel, X-ray machines, bio-metric electronic surveillance and dogs with armed troopers, what once was a care-free journey across the Land of the Free now resembles George Orwell’s 1984.
Amtrak Will Screen Passengers’ Bags
By SARAH KARUSH
February 20, 2008
Amtrak will start randomly screening passengers’ carry-on bags this week in a new security push that includes officers with automatic weapons and bomb-sniffing dogs patrolling platforms and trains.
The initiative, to be announced by the railroad on Tuesday, is a significant shift for Amtrak. Unlike the airlines, it has had relatively little visible increase in security since the 2001 terrorist attacks, a distinction that has enabled it to attract passengers eager to avoid airport hassles.
Amtrak officials insist their new procedures won’t hold up the flow of passengers.
“On-time performance is a key element of Amtrak service. We are fully mindful of that. This is not about train delays,” Bill Rooney, the railroad’s vice president for security strategy and special operations, told The Associated Press.
Nor will the moves require passengers to arrive at stations far in advance, officials said. Passengers who are selected randomly for the screening will be delayed no more than a couple of minutes, Amtrak chief executive Alex Kummant said.
“We’re very conscious of the fact that you’re in an environment where commuters have minutes to go from train to train,” he said.
Concern about Amtrak security has been mounting since the 2004 bombings of commuter trains in Madrid that killed 191 people. Trains also have been bombed in London, where 52 people were killed in a series of blasts in 2005, most of them on subway trains, and in Mumbai, India, where 200 people were killed in 2006 on commuter trains. Russia also has had several bombings on subway, commuter and long-distance trains.
The new procedures draw heavily on measures being used in the New York City subways, Rooney said. That model has been upheld in court challenges, he noted.
Amtrak plans to roll out the new “mobile security teams” first on the Northeast Corridor between Washington and Boston, the railroad’s most heavily used route, before expanding them to the rest of the country.
The teams will show up unannounced at stations and set up baggage screening areas in front of boarding gates. Officers will randomly pull people out of line and wipe their bags with a special swab that is then put through a machine that detects explosives. If the machine detects anything, officers will open the bag for visual inspection.
Anybody who is selected for screening and refuses will not be allowed to board and their ticket will be refunded.
In addition to the screening, counterterrorism officers with bomb-sniffing dogs will patrol platforms and walk through trains, and sometimes will ride the trains, officials said.
Tim Connors, director of the Center for Policing Terrorism at the Manhattan Institute, said rail systems require a completely different approach to security from the one used in aviation.
“Rail moves a lot more people than air does,” he said. “It’s designed to be an open system that can move a lot of people fast.”
One of Congress’ biggest advocates for passenger rail, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said the security initiative makes sense as long as it doesn’t cause delays.
“Given that terrorists have chosen passenger rail as one of their targets of choice, provided this doesn’t slow things down or require additional longer lines and waits, this plan is certainly worth trying,” he said in a statement.
Connors said random screening could be effective.
“A random approach is actually more effective than a constant one,” he said, adding that when procedures don’t change, it’s easier for would-be terrorists to find weak spots. Amtrak hopes the new force can serve as a powerful deterrent to would-be terrorists.
“What we are trying to do is make sure the bad guys know we’re out there but don’t know where we’ll be, or when,” Rooney said.
Amtrak did not provide figures for the program’s cost, but said its total security budget — including police, security strategy and emergency preparedness — is about $60 million. The railroad has about 400 security personnel, including about 300 sworn police officers, Kummant said.
Amtrak’s previous passenger screening consisted of sporadic identification checks by train conductors, which the railroad says it plans to continue. Passengers also are required to show ID when buying tickets from station agents, though there is no such requirement from passengers buying tickets from self-serve kiosks.
The Transportation Security Administration is also expected to continue sporadic deployments to stations around the country.
Amtrak has received a number of federal grants aimed at boosting security, but officials said there was no specific mandate to implement the changes.
“There is no new or different specific threat,” Kummant said. “This is just the correct step to take.”